Similar USC Presidential campaign videos use the “Forgione Formula”

USC candidates

USC Presidential candidates hope to walk away with the win.

If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, then Andrew Forgione is going to get a big head this election season. When the campaign videos for the 2012 USC presidential candidates were released just after midnight on Tuesday morning, it was clear that Forgione’s campaign methods wouldn’t soon be forgotten.

Right off the bat, third-year Science student, Logan Ross, used a segment of Forgione’s famous Ducksauce tribute in her campaign video; but Ross isn’t the only one to take something away from Forgione’s successful run. All the other candidates—fifth-year Social-Sci student Claire McArthur, fourth-year Huron student Adam Fearnall, and fourth-year FIMS student Jon Silver—are all guilty of using the “Forgione Formula.”

What does this formula entail? The basics: A catchy musical accompaniment, impressive editing, and a montage of laughs and good times with a number of notable Western students. However confident of the Formula these candidates are, there do exist inherent flaws.

Let’s start with the music. The logic behind this decision is sound, running with the notion that if the song gets stuck in my head, I’ll remember the candidate. But a distinction should be made between remembering a candidate, and voting for a candidate. Of course, they risk the song becoming more annoying than memorable. If the song is the most prominent part of the video (which, in the Forgione Formula, it always is) then voters can grow to despise the song and avoid all future screenings of the video like it were the plague, something Ms. McArthur might not have considered.

Next up, the editing. All the videos feature visually stimulating effects (some nearing epileptic levels) and, with the exception of Ross’ Rick Mercer Rant, shared a very specific editing technique in which the candidate walks toward the camera as the background changes. Now, before anyone starts hypothesising who had the idea first, you should know it was none of them. The concept has been around for a while, most notably in a video sponsored by STA Travel released just last August. It will forever be unknown who thought of utilizing this technique first, but in a time when the candidates should be distinguishing themselves from one another, this is an unfortunate step back.

And finally, a key ingredient: the Interchangeable Elites. This is perhaps the worst aspect of the Forgione Formula because it not only follows the logic that having a popular person in your video will lead to a popular campaign, but it also overlooks a significant portion of Western students—the frosh. Candidates should be reaching out to first-years, many of whom are excited about their first Western election. Instead, they are left to watch sixty seconds of laughing strangers.

By following the Forgione Formula, a candidate is left with an impressive video with high entertainment value. This, we should be be reminded, is a competition to find the next president of the USC, not Canada’s next great videographer.

Though all candidates have leadership experience to widely varied degrees and some mildly creative platform points (Ross being the only one to note any in her video), this information mostly took a back seat once again. The mitZine urges you to disregard the videos and look into the platforms. The only information you’ll derive from the campaign videos is that they all have friends, a computer, and can walk in a straight line.

Stay tuned to the mitZine Online this week for some analysis on the presidential candidate platforms.

5 thoughts on “Similar USC Presidential campaign videos use the “Forgione Formula”

  1. Firstly, this isn’t the Forgione Formula. It has been happening for years. Whether it’s Emily Rowe, Mike T, Forgione, Rick Perry or Obama, catchy campaign videos is a very popular way to reach a large audience and influence public opinion. For this reason, it is rather unfortunate and surprising that a zine coming from MIT students is discouraging looking a campaign videos. If one’s video is catchy and intrigues a particular audience interest, then people will care to look further into the candidate’s platform. While I agree that looking at the platform is important, unfortunately, that is not how a majority of the student body (or general population) works. I know many, many people that will vote based on a “silly” campaign video. So in my opinion, the candidates should’ve spent more time in making this video constructively and including something about themselves. Personally, I think the only person who failed to include any words is Jon Silver. I can’t help but think this article is biased, considering he is in FIMS and his video is currently the one with the most dislikes and negative comments. He is a good candidate, it’s unfortunate his video isn’t as appealing as the work he’s done.

    • While I appreciate your comment and agree with you on a number of points, you should know the article is in no way bias. The point of this article was not to rank the “best” and “worst” campaign video, but rather to highlight trends. Trends which are described as the “Forgione Formula” not because he was the first person to create a video with entertainment value but because he was the most recent and relevant example in the Western community.
      So while you are fully entitled to consider Jon Silver’s video as the worst, you cannot claim that his connection to FIMS tainted this article. With that logic all Science students would blindly follow Logan Ross, or all Huron students with Adam Fearnall. This is a University, not a herd of sheep. We’re capable of developing individual thoughts.

      • You would be surprised how many parallels there are between popular public opinion and a herd of sheep. Sadly, while you make great points, and seem like a very educated individual, a lot of people cannot develop individual thoughts. A very bad example of this would be the abundance of lame trends we see on campus everyday because “everybody else is doing them”. Good thing Jon Silver put up a much better video. Just goes to show that campaign videos are in fact a very important part of the election process if not the most important. And cannot simply be “ignored”.

  2. “…(Forgione)… was the first person to create a video with entertainment…” “…he was the most recent and relevant example in the Western community…”

    Emily Rowe’s campaign video was the first in USC election history to go viral on YouTube. (There were USC videos many many years prior to, which played in televisions throughout campus). Rowe’s video attracted more than 60,000 viewers, Maclean’s magazine and national newspapers. To call this the “Forgione Formula” sounds a tad naive and undeserved. There are 4th and 5th year voting students who were around during the days of Rowe and Lecce.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s